The scholarly publishing ecosystem continues to rapidly evolve due to continued pressure from research funders and academic institutions to accelerate Open Access (OA), Open Research, and Open Science.
Herman Mentink focuses on the impact and importance of communication and collaboration between publishers and their institutional partners, as well as with internal stakeholders.
Read about CCC’s support of the Generations Fund, which provides long-term resources to two critical program areas: leadership-workforce development and diversity, equity and inclusion.
For Peer Review Week 2022, Dave Davis focuses on the “before”, “in process” and “final” versions of articles. Here, calling them preprints, postprints, and the “versions of record.”
CCC has launched a new automated, data-driven tool designed to improve content providers’ ability to generate the clean, actionable information required to craft agreements with research institutions and funders of open-access publishing.
Dave Davis sits down for a virtual chat with Laura Cox of CCC’s Ringgold Solutions team to discuss PIDs, disambiguation, and the role each plays in improving scholarly communications.
A peer-reviewed article published this month in PLOS ONE has examined what happens in the scientific record when journal-published versions of articles are retracted in cases of research previously available on preprint servers.