Our publishing industry experts look forward to discussing the various metadata challenges facing the scholarly publishing community and how we might work together to develop solutions to meet those challenges.
Data quality is an expression of a data’s usefulness and value. We often describe the things we build as knowledge systems, or a system that takes data as its input and, through a series of data process steps, extracts as much of the ‘actionable information’ in the data as is possible.
The guiding role of metadata in an increasingly complex scholarly research ecosystem will be the focus of a CCC panel discussion at the London Book Fair as part of the Research & Scholarly Publishing Forum.
As publishers continue to leverage new systems and tools in their efforts to continually improve publishing workflows, additional challenges with inconsistent and inaccurate metadata have emerged.
In Thomas Kuhn’s work, paradigms are characterized by “universally recognized scientific achievements that for a time provide model problems and solutions to a community of practitioners.”
We’re breaking down the different types of personalization used by search engines so we can recognize the benefits of applying these tools to data searches in the business environment.
The Public Library of Science (PLOS) has adopted the industry-leading Ringgold Identify Database as its Persistent Identifier (PID) solution to streamline organizational data, helping power its Open Access (OA) publishing process with reliability and inclusivity.
RightFind Navigate has seen major enhancements, including new data source connectors, boosts in search functionality, and more. Read on to learn ‘the why’ behind these big updates.