The transition to Open Access (OA) business models and subsequent funding mandates has introduced many challenges for publishers, including an additional level of complexity to their publishing workflows.
Decentralized spending for information resources often goes unnoticed and, in terms of use, employees may not be aware of what they can and can’t do with purchased content.
A peer-reviewed article published this month in PLOS ONE has examined what happens in the scientific record when journal-published versions of articles are retracted in cases of research previously available on preprint servers.
In the accelerating transition to Open Access, The Microbiology Society has concentrated great attention on making strides to streamline author workflow from submission and review to publication.
CTO Babis Marmanis discusses the impact data quality has on knowledge production, with examples from our experiences working with bibliographic raw metadata for the CCC COVID Author Graph.
Ongoing calls for social change have drawn attention to the need in scholarly publishing for greater equity, diversity, and inclusion, including for peer review, editorial practices, and business models.